On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 12:45:14AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > "Some packages were pushed to stable before they should have been, > > therefore we need to make it easier to push packages to stable"? > > Yes! Sure, this sounds paradoxical, but my premise is that NO MATTER how > strict you make the requirement for pushes to stable, there will ALWAYS be > the possibility that "sh*t happens" and thus a need to be able to rush out > fixes to stable as quickly as possible.
And my premise is that we should be making harder for shit to happen, and the cases where it *does* should be examined carefully to determine the best way forwards. "Force this untested package into stable" isn't the best way to do things. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
