On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:06 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > > Adding normal packages are requirements for a devel package just to make > it > > multilib feels... unclean? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something. In > order > > to have the logic self-contained, why don't we add something like > > "Provides: multilib(x86_64, i686)" into affected packages and make pungi > > process that? > > Feel free to suggest it to rpm. ;) >
Why rpm? Isn't that entirely in our hands, what Provides we assign to Fedora packages and what meaning we give it? > > I'd personally just like to drop i686 entirely, but I don't think > everyone else is ready for that. > No no no, I'm not willing to give up my games collection! :-)
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
