On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 18:04, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>
wrote:

> On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 09:55 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > >
> > > So, what do folks think? Does this seem like a good idea? Should I go
> > > ahead with trying to get it deployed and onboard things to it? Any
> > > comments, ideas, potential problems? Thanks!
> > >
> >
> >
> > I am pretty sure you did :-) but have you looked at adding the missing
> > information to Bodhi ? Now that we have rawhide in Bodhi we should be
> able
> > to expose most the information needed.
>
> I didn't look at that in any technical detail but conceptually it seems
> kinda wrong to me. The problem with using any existing system is that
> all existing systems are *for* something. Bodhi is for dealing with
> updates. There's no reason why Bodhi would track, for instance, whether
> 34 is under a string freeze, right? Because Bodhi doesn't have anything
> to do with translations. There are a zillion other 'states' that it
> would be useful to have info on which aren't relevant to any *one*
> existing system, and that's why to me it makes sense to have a separate
> thing for that.
>

I was wondering about the 4 Needs bullet points in your original email
which could be in Bodhi but yes if we want to add more and more info a
seperate app makes sense :-)

-- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
> https://www.happyassassin.net
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to