Thank you. I may very well do that. Carol
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:57 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 03:13:29PM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote: > > In our code base (restraint), we patch and recompile the m4 code base. > > https://github.com/tar-mirror/gnu-m4 > > In their code, they have the following which fails to compile when > SIGSTKSZ > > < 16384 is interpreted. > > This is going to be a challenge to make work. > > > > # define SIGSTKSZ 8192 > > #ifndef SIGSTKSZ > > # define SIGSTKSZ 16384 > > #elif HAVE_LIBSIGSEGV && SIGSTKSZ < 16384 > > /* libsigsegv 2.6 through 2.8 have a bug where some architectures use > > more than the Linux default of an 8k alternate stack when deciding > > if a fault was caused by stack overflow. */ > > # undef SIGSTKSZ > > # define SIGSTKSZ 16384 > > #endif > > AFAICT libsigsegv 2.8 is a release dating from 2009, obsoleted by the > 2.9 release in 2010. > > I'd question whether this code really need to workaround a bug in > something that is 11 years old. > > IOW, I'd suggest just deleting this hack entirely. > > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: https://berrange.com -o- > https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| > |: https://libvirt.org -o- > https://fstop138.berrange.com :| > |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- > https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
