Is there any preference for fuse3 over fuse2? I moved a package over
to fuse3 yesterday[1]. The API[2] seems a bit cleaner, but it's no
big deal. However it's not really feasible to support both. Since I
maintain several other fuse-using packages in Fedora, we have to pick
one or the other.
I notice also that almost no other packages have moved to fuse3:
$ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libfuse.so.2()(64bit)' --qf '%{name}' |
sort -u | wc -l
62
$ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libfuse3.so.3()(64bit)' --qf '%{name}' |
sort -u | wc -l
7
Are we going to deprecate fuse2 at some point? Encourage upstreams to
upgrade?
One other minor point: BSDs can emulate fuse (which is essentially a
Linux-only API), but their emulation seems to be of fuse2 only.
Rich.
[1]
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commit/c74c7d7f01975e708b510e518895088fc61b5623
[2] https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/releases/tag/fuse-3.0.0
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
