From: "Miro Hrončok" <mhron...@redhat.com>
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Cc: "Kaleb Keithley" <kkeit...@redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 12:26:54 AM
Subject: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
On 19. 05. 21 0:17, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:15 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com
<mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Full report available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-05-18.txt
<https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-05-18.txt>
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
rubygem-maruku?
Indeed.
If I'm reading your report correctly it's saying that it's pcs which
depends on
rubygem-maruku. (And glusterfs, or more specifically, glusterfs-ganesha
depends
on pcs.)
That is also correct.
I took the dummy's way out (rather than simply trust the report) and
installed
pcs (and a bunch of other things before I realized what the report was
saying)
on both my f34 and f35/rawhide boxes. In both cases rubygem-maruku was
_not_
installed.
The problematic dependency is a transitive build dependency. Your test only
verifies runtime dependencies.
Also `rpm -q --requires pcs` did not list rubygem-maruku.
Similarly, this only queries direct runtime dependencies.
----
From the full linked report:
Depending on: rubygem-maruku (43), status change: 2021-05-06 (1 weeks ago)
rubygem-tilt (maintained by: valtri, vondruch)
rubygem-tilt-2.0.10-4.fc34.src requires rubygem(asciidoctor) =
2.0.15,
rubygem(maruku) = 0.7.2
pcs (maintained by: cfeist, idevat, mlisik, omular, tojeline)
pcs-0.10.8-1.fc34.src requires rubygem-tilt = 2.0.10-4.fc34
pcs-0.10.8-1.fc34.x86_64 requires rubygem-tilt = 2.0.10-4.fc34
So, technically:
- Once rubygem-maruku is retired, rubygem-tilt fails to build.
- Iff rubygem-tilt is not fixed, it will be orphaned and retired
eventually.
- Once rubygem-tilt is retired, pcs fails to build and fails to install.
- When pcs fails to install, so does glusterfs-ganesha.
The script creating this output is run and developed by Fedora
Release Engineering. Please report issues at its pagure instance:
https://pagure.io/releng/ <https://pagure.io/releng/>
Should I file a report? ;-)
If you know how to present the information in a less confusing way, please do
file a report.
