Hello, I'm orphaning the vim-syntastic package as I no longer use that (I switched to vim-ale a few months back). Feel free to pick that package, if you happen to use it and you can not migrate - but upstream of syntastic recommends the migration: https://github.com/vim-syntastic/syntastic/issues/2288
A typical bugreport there looks like rhbz#1834153 or rhbz#1955850. The packaging approach was kind of unsuccessful experiment (many language-specific sub-packages depending on existing syntax checkers). Perhaps, if anyone interested, that approach should be changed [see below]. I also observed there's a long-term issue in Fedora with excluding noarch sub-packages. By example, thing is that some language analyzers aren't available on all Fedora architectures - but if some sub-package run-time depends on such package - maintainer naturally wants to arch-exclude such (noarch) sub-package from composes. But there currently isn't a nice way to do this. https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/87 For vim-ale, I decided to go with simpler approach - where each user is responsible for manually installing the backend syntax checkers. Therefore, when vim-ale in installed, a complete set of vim configuration (for all language checkers) is installed. Vim-ale review request goes here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974597 Pavel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
