g-i-s is still broken in the Workstation iso for Rawhide today btw just fyi, crashing after install in a Virtualbox VM for me
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:20 PM Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:14 PM Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:09 PM Fedora Rawhide Report >> <rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> > ===== ADDED PACKAGES ===== >> > Package: atkmm2.36-2.36.1-1.fc36 >> > Summary: C++ interface for the ATK library >> > RPMs: atkmm2.36 atkmm2.36-devel atkmm2.36-doc >> > Size: 1.35 MiB >> >> (...) >> >> > Package: glibmm2.68-2.68.1-1.fc36 >> > Summary: C++ interface for the GLib library >> > RPMs: glibmm2.68 glibmm2.68-devel glibmm2.68-doc >> > Size: 12.65 MiB >> > >> > Package: gtkmm4.0-4.4.0-1.fc36 >> > Summary: C++ interface for the GTK+ library >> > RPMs: gtkmm4.0 gtkmm4.0-devel gtkmm4.0-doc >> > Size: 17.64 MiB >> > >> > Package: pangomm2.48-2.48.1-1.fc36 >> > Summary: C++ interface for Pango >> > RPMs: pangomm2.48 pangomm2.48-devel pangomm2.48-doc >> > Size: 1.26 MiB >> >> Is there a reason why these compat packages are done "the wrong way >> round"? >> They were requested with exceptions to the review process, but that >> exception only applies to requesting versioned compat packages for the >> *old* version, not the other way round ... >> > > Sure, there's a good reason! I wanted to keep the same pattern as gtk has, > so that there's gtk3 and matching gtkmm3.0, and gtk4 and matching gtkmm4.0. > > They are all long-lived parallel installable packages and most stuff is > going to be using the "old" gtkmm3.0 still for a number of years to come. > > Doing it this way also makes it much easier to add the new packages to F34 > where I don't want to be undertaking large package renaming. > > -- > Kalev > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
