On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 12:26 PM Petr Menšík <pemen...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello Sahana and Jakub, > > openssl-pkcs11 module failed during rebuild. It has no separate bug yet, > but missing pkcs11 engine for OpenSSL 3.0 bind build makes freeipa server > fail to even start. > > Filled bug #2005832 [1]. CentOS Stream 9 build of openssl-pkcs11 were > successful, I think there are missing changes required on Rawhide. Please > include required fixes also in Rawhide. > Hi Petr, Jakub has fixed it in openssl-pkcs11-0.4.11-6.fc36. > Is there any timeline, when would be FTBFS bugs filled? > Yeah I wanted to file them 3/4 weeks after the introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0. So tentatively around mid october. Thank you, Regards, Sahana Prasad > I did not yet found any bug on openssl-pkcs11. I would expect openssl > engine packages would be ready before mass rebuild. Could it be fixed soon > please? > > Cheers, > Petr > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005832 > On 9/20/21 10:47, Sahana Prasad wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:50 PM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 5:09 AM Sahana Prasad <sah...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hello all, >> > >> > The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in >> rawhide now. >> > You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now. >> > >> > The following packages FTBFS (attached), kindly have a look at them. >> > I haven't reported FTBFS bugs right away. As I know many packages have >> the porting ready already >> > and they were waiting for 3.0.0 to land in rawhide. >> > Some packages fail due to usage of deprecated functions. Consider >> treating those warnings as not errors >> > for a quick fix and you could slowly stop using deprecated functions in >> the future. >> > >> > Thanks Miro for your help with building packages in the side-tag and >> getting a list of failed packages. >> > >> > We will try a rebuild of all these failed packages after 3/4 weeks and >> report bugs for failing packages then. >> > >> >> I noticed that the changelog for the openssl package got truncated. Is >> there a reason for this? The spec file wasn't significantly rewritten, >> nor was there some other condition invalidating the entire recorded >> history of the package. Would you kindly please restore the changelog >> to the spec file? >> > > Hi Neal, > I will restore it. > Thank you, > Regards, > Sahana Prasad > > >> >> >> >> -- >> 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! >> >> > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > > -- > Petr Menšík > Software Engineer > Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/ > email: pemen...@redhat.com > PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
