On Wednesday, September 22, 2021 1:46:11 PM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote: > > 4) maybe fapolicyd-cli has better detection? Or at least, its more > > closely > > maintained. It also has it's own ELF detection so that it's stable from > > release to release. > > Not checked whether it has better detection or not, but I see it would pull > the following packages into the default buildroot:
<snip> > python-pip-wheel > python-setuptools-wheel > python3-libs > python3 I think this is a packaging mistake. That would remove a fair amount of what's pulled in. > systemd-pam > systemd-rpm-macros > systemd It needs libudev, but we get the whole thing. > Installed size: 54 M > > > I don't think this is acceptable. Even systemd and Python alone are not > supposed to be there. I'll ask about fixing the package. But I guess the other option is to identify problems with libmagic and contribute fixes. That's what we have to do for fapolicyd. Btw, I just looked at F34 and rawhide to compare. Rawhide looks much, much better as in things that are executable really are supposed to be. However, F34...not so much. There's a lot of png files that are execuatble. This cleanup is appreciated. By chance do you have a pointer to one of those javascript files that is misidentified? (Or any other for that matter). I'd like to see what's going on and get a fix in place. Cheers, -Steve _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
