Dne 27. 01. 22 v 11:19 Iñaki Ucar napsal(a):
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 10:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:I think this change should be reverted until a cleaner way can be found to implement it.I'm all for making better, but please make concrete proposals.Here's a concrete proposal:- Copy %build_*flags to another private macro, let's say %_build_*flags. - Add there the stuff that is not valid once the current build finishes (e.g., the flag that this change adds). - Use that in %set_build_flags and leave %build_*flags as it was.
That sounds similar to "%extension_cflags/%extension_cxxflags/%extension_ldflags" Zbyszek already mentioned elsewhere. Or I don't get the point.
Here is concrete proposal for Ruby: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/110 Vít
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
