On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 14:00 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 11:09 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:32:22AM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 23:57 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > A new gcc with most importantly the
> > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/PR104172
> > > > bug (that caused a lot of ppc64le failures) fixed and various
> > > > other
> > > > fixes (e.g. std::basic_string(std::nullptr_t) = deleted only
> > > > done
> > > > for C++23 etc.) is now in rawhide.
> > > > 
> > > > Can rel-eng please retry all FTBS builds that failed on
> > > > ppc64le?
> > > 
> > > it appears to me, that this breaks build of NetworkManager:
> > >    https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81998774
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   checking if gcc supports flag -fno-strict-aliasing in envvar
> > > CFLAGS... yes
> > >   checking if gcc supports flag -flto -flto-partition=none in
> > > envvar CFLAGS... no
> > >   configure: error: Link Time Optimization -flto is not
> > > supported.
> > >   error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.FQqAFe (%build)
> > 
> > Apparently it was annobin (although it passed the test done during
> > gcc.spec
> > testing, apparently it was incompatible again).
> > Florian has rebuilt it, so please just retry.


Hi,

after a few days, it seems, the problem still exists in the buildroot
for copr:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/networkmanager/NetworkManager-main/build/3288936/

Should we just wait longer and it solves itself?


best,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to