On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 8:07 PM Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 12:23:41 -0600, > Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 09:06:01 -0600, > > > >The Fedora 36 beta is likely to slip because firefox was not building > >successfully on i686, but was on other arches. > > It is actually more complicated than I remembered. Firefox needed a gcc fix, > but gcc building is blocked on an i686 issue. And the delay in getting > that fix combined with the long time for doing a gcc build is seemingly > going to result in a slip because a firefox downgrade (from the f35 version) > would cause problems for some testers.
So ... this sounds like firefox would be a good example of a package that would benefit from my proposal? - It's already almost a leaf package (only some other GUI apps - that could also drop i686 support without any consequences - depend on it). - We already do not publish or ship firefox.i686 RPMs - or RPMs for the 4 dependent applications, for that matter - to anybody, so building them is just a waste of time and maintainer resources. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
