On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:31 AM Jiri Vanek <jva...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > You have valid points. > The non transitive list is indeed not somehow immense[1]. Will add it to wiki > page. Will also provide few recursive iterations. Ty for reminder. > As for the java-arches macro, I have no objections to it. It is PR to > jpackages-tools? But maybe one note against - it may cause inconsistency, if > somebody will decide to maintain another version of java - eg as now happens > for jdk8 aarch32
Thank you for including the list of non-noarch Java packages. However, *all* Java packages will need to be adapted to have "ExcludeArch: i686", even the noarch packages (which will need something like: "ExclusiveArch: everything-except-i686 noarch"). Otherwise the noarch packages will randomly fail to build, if they are assigned to a i686 builder. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
