On 6/17/22 01:41, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 07:13:55PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fno-omit-frame-pointer >>> [...] >>> === Unwinding === >>> [...] >>> * Kernel 4.8 frame pointer benchmarks by Suse showed 5%-10% >>> regressions in some benchmarks >>> (https://lore.kernel.org/all/20170602104048.jkkzssljsompj...@suse.de/T/#u) >> >> Regressions of such magnitude can veto such changes, especially when >> they hit everyone, not just those who are highly dependent on the >> profiling tools the proposal is concerned about. > > I can only concur. Say what you want about Phoronix benchmark, but > they consistently benchmark different distributions And Fedora > consistently is lagging behind. Latest article is at > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=h1-2022-linux > > Slowing Fedora even further is really undesirable.
What would it take to make Fedora faster? -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
