Yes, thank you very much! Pavel
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 4:00 PM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Dne 26. 07. 22 v 17:00 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): > > Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 22:40: > >> On 26. 07. 22 15:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > >>> Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28: > >>>> Dear maintainers. > >>>> > >>>> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the > >>>> following packages > >>>> will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before > >>>> branching (August 2022). > >>>> > >>>> Policy: > >>>> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ > >>>> > >>>> The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since > >>>> Fedora 35. > >>>> > >>>> This report is based on dist tags. > >>>> > >>>> Packages collected via: > >>>> > https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> If you see a package that was built, please let me know. > >>>> If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, > >>>> please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval > >>>> for that. > >>>> > >>>> If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so. > >>>> > >>>> Package (co)maintainers > >>>> > ========================================================================= > >>>> > >>>> rubygem-sprockets-rails jaruga, pvalena, > >>>> ruby-packagers-sig > >>>> > >>>> Depending on: rubygem-sprockets-rails (22) > >>>> rubygem-actionmailbox (maintained by: pvalena) > >>>> rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires > >>>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2 > >>>> > >>>> rubygem-activestorage (maintained by: ruby-packagers-sig, > >>>> vondruch) > >>>> rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src requires > >>>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2 > >>>> > >>>> rubygem-railties (maintained by: mmorsi, pvalena, tdawson, > >>>> vondruch) > >>>> rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires > >>>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2 > >>>> > >>>> rubygem-sassc-rails (maintained by: pvalena) > >>>> rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch requires > >>>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2 > >>>> rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src requires > >>>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2 > >>>> ... > >>>> > >>> > >>> Can you show what changed for rubygem-sprockets-rails compared with > >>> the previous report one week ago? > >>> > >>> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/BEYCREMETV6DDVFMLKOE5HR2XWEWBPFE/ > >>> > >>> > >>> The above report seems to be saying that no package depends on > >>> rubygem-sprockets-rails, > >>> but this time many packages depend on rubygem-sprockets-rails. > >> > >> Only 4 packages directly require rubygem(sprockets-rails): > >> > >> rubygem-actionmailbox > >> rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src > >> > >> rubygem-activestorage > >> rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src > >> > >> rubygem-railties > >> rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src > >> > >> rubygem-sassc-rails > >> rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch > >> rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src > >> > >> > >> I've checked and from the spec files, it seems that they always did. > >> > >> I've repoqueried this compose > >> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20220719.n.0/ > >> and it seems that the requirements were there. > >> > >> The only difference, it seems, is that rubygem-image_processing was > >> part of the FTBFS packages set before and its dep tree already > >> included those packages, so the script decided not to report them > >> twice :( > >> > >> > https://pagure.io/releng/blob/c9a08daa74/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans.py#_419 > >> > >> > >> When I remove this thing, and re-add rubygem-image_processing to the > >> list of FTBFS packages, I see rubygem-sprockets-rails's dependencies > >> reported. > >> > >> I guess we should fix the script, this is dangerous. > >> > >> And if you think this justifies not retiring rubygem-sprockets-rails > >> this round, I am OK with that. > >> > >> Thanks for spotting this. No other remaining packages here seem to be > >> affected by this now. > >> > > > > Okay, thank you for confirmation. > > > > Anyway now I checked the upstream repo and the upstream already fixed > > build issue. > > So I've backported the upstream fix and now build was successful as > > rubygem-sprockets-rails-3.2.2-6.fc37 . > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2036386 > > > Thx a lot for fixing those. I appreciate that. > > > Vít > > > > > > Regards, > > Mamoru > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
