On 23. 08. 22 23:46, Fabio Valentini wrote:
even if the advice is: "yes, retire the packages, rather
than leave them broken, they can be added back once they have been
fixed"

Knowing nothing about Pantheon or GObject C, I do think this is always better than noninstallable packages. So if all other efforts fail, I would retire the packages before Final Freeze and only introduce them back if ever fixed.

Yes, it may be emotionally a bit painful, but IMHO it gives a clearer message to our users if the package is missing rather than utterly broken.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to