On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:03:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Isn't peer review much better and easier solution over all? We could also > require signed commits I guess.
I think it would slow things down quite a lot to require peer review of every commit. I'd personally like to avoid anything where we need to support gpg. It's a mess and I think it would waste a lot of cycles explaining how to use it or help people get setup. ;( If there's some easier/more clear way to sign things that could be a option tho. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
