> Am 04.11.2022 um 23:08 schrieb Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>:
> 
> On Fri, 2022-11-04 at 22:33 +0100, Peter Boy wrote:
>> I just tested installation of the various Fedora Server Edition installation 
>> media as of F37 rc 1.6.
>> 
>> Arm image, Server KVM image and Server standard install (DVD) installed 
>> kernel 6.0.6-300.fc37. Only net install installed kernel 5.19.16-301.fc37 
>> (which was installed by rc 1.4 or 1.5 if I remember correctly). A check of 
>> the installation file resulted „ok“.
>> 
>> Is there a particular reason? Or I am the only one?
> 
> This is normal and expected. The newer kernel from RC-1.6 has not been
> pushed stable yet, so it is not in the repos used by the network
> installer.

OK. There some more minor differences between current net and dvd install 
regarding errors and warnings from SELinux and systemd. Let’s hope that they 
will vanish once net install uses the same kernel.


>> 
>> And netinstall doesn’t preselect the correct download source anymore, but 
>> asked to "Confirm Selection“ and complained about "Error setting up base 
>> repository“ (local media is preselected which doesn’t include it, of course)
> 
> That's not intended, but also not what openQA sees:
> https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1567623/video?filename=video.ogv
> https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1567623#step/_boot_to_anaconda/13
> as you can see there, after the test just booted the ISO and waited a
> while, Installation Source was in the expected state. Was there a
> transient network problem or something on your test, perhaps?
> 
> I guess this may also happen if the network does not work out of the
> box on your system, but requires you to go through the network spoke
> first to make it work. anaconda will try to set up the repo right away
> when it starts up, so if the network isn't yet working at that point,
> it will likely fail and end up in this state. That's not new, though.

I’m sure the network worked all the time. And anaconda detected time zone, 
local language, etc. correctly. 


Maybe, I’ll test it tomorrow again. Nevertheless, it is a minor issue and given 
the delays that have already occurred, it is not a reason to delay the release 
date again, I think. But in case you are planning a rc 1.7 it would be worth to 
check it.







--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org

Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)


Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora docs team contributor
Java developer and enthusiast


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to