On Wed, 2023-03-15 at 07:54 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 6:32 AM Sandro <li...@penguinpee.nl> wrote: > > > > On 15-03-2023 00:34, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 7:17 PM Sandro <li...@penguinpee.nl> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Apologies for my late response. I have been swamped with other > > > > things... > > > > > > > > On 27-02-2023 16:05, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:04 AM Sérgio Basto > > > > > <ser...@serjux.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 10:27 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like libheif now supports a plugin architecture, > > > > > > > so we could > > > > > > > move libheif to Fedora, while having the HEVC/H.265 > > > > > > > backend plugin in > > > > > > > RPM Fusion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, according to the CMake, the HEVC/H.265 plugins are > > > > > > > not built by > > > > > > > default anymore: > > > > > > > https://github.com/strukturag/libheif/blob/cdcc5b210879e0a0348032a594f8be52bb739c0d/CMakeLists.txt#L92-L98 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So feel free to package it and bring it into Fedora. :) > > > > > > > > I'm willing to give it a try. Yet, just submitting the package > > > > and > > > > getting it into Fedora is probably not enough. Some co- > > > > ordination with > > > > RPMFusion would be needed, I guess. And consuming packages > > > > would need to > > > > be updated to properly use the new library. > > > > > > > > If anyone could guide/assist me with that, I'd be grateful. > > > > > > > > > > So we can build libheif without H.265 on Fedora but how you > > > > > > propose > > > > > > make H.265 available with one third repo ? just build the > > > > > > plugin on > > > > > > third repo as a freeworld package ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be possible to build the plugin independently and link > > > > > to > > > > > libheif, but at the minimum, that's what I expect. > > > > > > > > The above exchange I do not quite grasp. I guess this is about > > > > making > > > > libheif-av1 (the Av1 only libheif, yet to be packaged) play > > > > nicely > > > > together with the unfree libheif (providing HEIF/libde265) > > > > provided by > > > > RPMFusion. > > > > > > > > To set things in motion I will try my hands on building a AV1 > > > > only > > > > libheif package and take it from there. > > > > > > > > > > Actually, I've got this done already locally. I can put it up for > > > review and you can grab it? > > > > > > Then I can give you co-maintainer privileges for it. > > > > Sure. That will work. Thanks Neal! > > > > Here it is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
LGTM > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
