On Mon Mar 27, 2023 at 07:27 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 11:57:04AM -0000, Aleš Matěj wrote: <snip> > > However you are right dnf can't handle that. It looks for deltas in the > > same repo where it finds > > the normal update package. It would require changes in dnf and libdnf. > > ok. Thanks for the info. > > If we want to bring drpms back to useful, I think this would probibly be the > best way to go. Then we could have some app that creates them async and > dnf could use them if available. > > kevin
Can you or someone else more familiar with DRPMs than I file a dnf5 RFE? https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/new -- Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/They _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
