I've gotten a similar result. Without --allowerasing:
Error:
Problem 1: conflicting requests
- problem with installed package gimp-heif-plugin-1.1.0-12.fc37.x86_64
- gimp-heif-plugin-1.1.0-12.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
Problem 2: problem with installed package libswscale-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with libswscale-free
provided by libswscale-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with libswscale-free
provided by libswscale-free-6.0-4.fc38.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 requires ffmpeg-libs(x86-64) = 6.0-6.fc38,
but none of the providers can be installed
- libswscale-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- conflicting requests
Problem 3: problem with installed package firefox-112.0-3.fc37.x86_64
- conflicting requests
- package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.i686 conflicts with libavcodec-free provided
by libavcodec-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with libavcodec-free
provided by libavcodec-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64
- problem with installed package libavcodec-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.i686 conflicts with libavcodec-free provided
by libavcodec-free-6.0-4.fc38.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with libavcodec-free
provided by libavcodec-free-6.0-4.fc38.x86_64
- firefox-112.0-3.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- libavcodec-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
If I add --allowerasing, I get:
Skipping packages with conflicts:
(add '--best' to command line to force their upgrade):
qt5-qtbase x86_64 5.15.9-1.fc38 updates 3.5 M
Steve
On 4/19/23 03:19 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
If I add --allowerasing, some packages will be removed:
Removing dependent packages:
ffmpeg-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 2.2 M
libavcodec-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 9.6 M
libavdevice-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 228 k
libavfilter-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 4.4 M
libavformat-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 2.6 M
libavutil-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 836 k
libpostproc-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 127 k
libswresample-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 152 k
libswscale-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 632 k
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:40 PM Neal Becker <ndbeck...@gmail.com
<mailto:ndbeck...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with ffmpeg-free provided
by ffmpeg-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64
- ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- conflicting requests
Problem 2: problem with installed package firefox-112.0-3.fc37.x86_64
- conflicting requests
- package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.i686 conflicts with libavcodec-free
provided by libavcodec-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with libavcodec-free
provided by libavcodec-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64
- problem with installed package libavcodec-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64
- libavcodec-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- firefox-112.0-3.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting
packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 5:49 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl
<mailto:zbys...@in.waw.pl>> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 06:30:36PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade
wrote:
> > > - problem with installed package
msv-xsdlib-1:2013.6.1-19.fc33.noarch
> > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
> >
> > I'll add this one to fedora-obsolete-packages.
> >
> >
> It looks like you've only added the main package msv [0]. However,
that
> package doesn't exist as a binary rpm, the srpm only produces msv-*
> subpackages [1]. And obsoleting the main package won't obsolete the
> subpackages, so this conflict is not fixed yet. I'm not sure if any
of the
> other msv-* subpackages should also be obsoleted or just msv-xsdlib.
I adjusted f-o-p to just list them all. I don't think we want to keep
some
subset of the subpackages.
Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
<https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/>
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines>
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
<https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
<https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue>
--
/Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it/
--
/Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
