Globe Trotter via devel wrote on 2023/05/15 23:36:
During unretirement of the package, I changed the dependency of slim from
desktop-backgrounds to f??-backgrounds-base in order to have a uniform
F-specific background for the slim login manager. However, the rawhide
installation can not find it. Any suggestions on what to do?
Thanks!
I don't think f39-backgrounds srpm is not packaged yet:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=package&terms=f*backgrounds*
BTW I am not sure if slim itself should have such dependency for f*backgrounds -
Usually such dependency is written on kickstart or comps file, I guess.
Regards,
Mamoru
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: bugzi...@redhat.com <bugzi...@redhat.com>
To: "itsme_...@yahoo.com" <itsme_...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 at 06:41:54 AM CDT
Subject: [Bug 2203836] New: F39FailsToInstall: slim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203836
Bug ID: 2203836
Summary: F39FailsToInstall: slim
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: slim
Assignee: itsme_...@yahoo.com
Reporter: fti-b...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: itsme_...@yahoo.com, pa...@hubbitus.info
Blocks: 2168845 (F39FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Please note that this comment was generated automatically by
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py
If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at
https://pagure.io/releng/
Your package (slim) Fails To Install in Fedora 39:
can't install slim:
- nothing provides f39-backgrounds-base needed by slim-1.4.0-6.fc39.x86_64
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please
acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to
maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent
packages realize the problem.
If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/),
your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.
P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer
than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the
koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock:
$ mock -r fedora-39-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install slim
P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple
dependent packages, please consider using side tags:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages
Thanks!
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168845
[Bug 2168845] Fedora 39 Fails To install Tracker
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
