On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 02:20:59AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > /home/rjones/d/fedora/polymake/rawhide/polymake-4.10/lib/core/src/perl/RefHash.xxs:737:11: > > error: ‘Perl_ck_fun’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean > > ‘Perl_cx_dup’? > > 737 | return Perl_ck_fun(aTHX_ o); > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > | Perl_cx_dup > > ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. > > As I understand it, this function is included in the public (at least, it is > declared EXT, so it should not be hidden) PL_check array (several times, the > first time at index 2), so I believe something like: > #define Perl_ck_fun (PL_check[2]) > should work.
That seems possible, although it's a bit of a hack to misuse the array like this: https://github.com/Perl/perl5/blob/ccfa6b533228ad41e4dbc5576cd43081b8fd2a13/opcode.h#L1431 I suppose if polymake is going to fiddle with Perl internals anyway, then why not. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plugins https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
