>From what I can tell in the spec file[1] for chromaprint, the only thing that's supposed to depend on ffmpeg is the tools package, but it seems to have found its way into libchromaprint[2] as well.
I'm trying to build a new version of codec2 with a soname change but I'm hitting this: DEBUG util.py:442: Problem: package libchromaprint-devel-1.5.1-11.fc39.i686 from build requires libchromaprint.so.1, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:442: - package libchromaprint-devel-1.5.1-11.fc39.i686 from build requires libchromaprint(x86-32) = 1.5.1-11.fc39, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:442: - package libchromaprint-1.5.1-11.fc39.i686 from build requires libavcodec.so.60, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:442: - package libchromaprint-1.5.1-11.fc39.i686 from build requires libavcodec.so.60(LIBAVCODEC_60), but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:442: - conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:442: - nothing provides libcodec2.so.1.0 needed by libavcodec-free-6.0-10.fc39.i686 from build I'm guessing I don't have a choice but to do a bootstrap build of libchromaprint without ffmpeg first... Thanks, Richard [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromaprint/blob/rawhide/f/chromaprint.spec [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=35116382
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
