On 8/7/23 12:38, Pavel Březina wrote:
IIUC, when 2228533 is resolved, I should switch from
mdns[-|4|6]_minimal to mdns[-|4|6] and otherwise keep it as is?
Yes.
The order of the modules should be also kept:
Current order is:
hosts: files myhostname libvirt libvirt_guest
mdns_minimal|mdns4_minimal|mdns6_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] resolve
[!UNAVAIL=return] dns
I wouldn't play with the order, because I don't understand it perfectly
to make such decisions, so yes, keep the order as it is.
Thanks,
Pavel
But I'm not a nss-mdns or avahi maintainer, just a maintainer of
stacks which use mdns often - printing and scanning. I've got this
opinion from issues in past, by checking nss-mdns code and by
intention of minimizing of new work in authselect, unless it is
necessary.
Zdenek
Yes, I admit current way of providing different plugins instead of
one plugin with related configuration is unfortunate. Because it
depends on avahi-daemon anyway, I hope it can be reduced to single
plugin, where every customization can be done on side of
avahi-daemon. But needs code modifications first, so waiting for a
volunteer.
--
Zdenek Dohnal
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, BRQ-TPBC
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
