V Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 01:25:08PM -0500, Christopher napsal(a): > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 9:24 AM Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > V Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 08:16:39AM -0500, Christopher napsal(a): > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:03 AM Jaroslav Mracek <jmra...@redhat.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I believe that one of the strong complains was related to not signed > > > > packages. The use case is that when I build RPMs locally and then I > > > > install them (see bellow). > > > > > > > > dnf install *.rpm --setopt=localpkg_gpgcheck=true > > > > ... > > > > Package dnf-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not signed > > > > Package dnf-automatic-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not > > > > signed > > > > Package dnf-data-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not signed > > > > Package python3-dnf-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not > > > > signed > > > > Package yum-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not signed > > > > Error: GPG check FAILED > > > > > > > > Jaroslav > > > > > > I think for the sake of security, it'd be better if this were on by > > > default, and you just had to specify the --nogpgcheck > > > > Technical note: --nogpgcheck does not imply localpkg_gpgcheck=false. Both of > > them operate independently. That's another painful property of the current > > code and documentation. > > > > -- Petr > > Why wouldn't this apply? Both the documentation for 'dnf' and > 'dnf.conf' use similar terminology "gpgcheck", and the man page says > "Skip checking GPG signatures on packages (if RPM policy allows)."
dnf.conf(5) reads (shortened):
gpgcheck
Whether to perform GPG signature check on packages found in this
repository.
localpkg_gpgcheck
Whether to perform a GPG signature check on local packages (packages in
a file, not in a repository).
> it doesn't apply, it seems like it definitely *should*, for
> intuitiveness-sake.
I agree it's not intuitive. That's why SuSE wants the meaning of "gpgcheck"
option to be configurable
<https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/727>.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
