On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
[snip]
> If there isn't anything wrong with the work of the other maintainer,
> then I guess I don't understand.  They did something in an honest
> attempt to save you the trouble and because of unfortunate timing they
> didn't actually save you any trouble.  But you aren't in a different
> position than if they hadn't tried to help.  (Excluding the time it took
> to start this discussion, of course.)

I'm very much with Jason on this… It's a nice clean fix to FTBFS.
If the maintainer did some work in parallel, then in the worst case
they need to do a git pull and remove the patch. In general, I'd be
very happy if somebody fixed an issue in one of my packages.

Zbyszek
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to