Or just latest zlib-ng update -- upstream change
https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/commit/6592accb2541aa637844cabef16b7adbb4cec4e1
got to fedora with update to 2.1.5 (Dec 27) and koschei started to fail Dec
28: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/evolution-data-server

Not sure whether it's a regression in zlib-ng or something to be changed in
evolution-data-server though, so CCing Tulio for awareness.

Honza

On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 10:22 AM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote:

> zlib-devel-1.2.13-4.fc39.x86_64 vs zlib-ng-compat-devel-2.1.5-1.fc40.x86_64
>
>
> Just guessing. I might be completely wrong.
>
>
> Vít
>
>
> Dne 05. 01. 24 v 9:59 Milan Crha napsal(a):
> >       Hi,
> > this is new to me. I'm trying to build evolution-data-server in a side
> > tag for rawhide and the build [1] fails in the CMake phase with error:
> >
> >     -- Performing Test HAVE_GPOWERPROFILEMONITOR
> >     CMake Error: Parse error in command line argument: WITH_GZFILEOP
> >      Should be: VAR:type=value
> >     CMake Error at
> /usr/share/cmake/Modules/Internal/CheckSourceCompiles.cmake:101
> (try_compile):
> >       Failed to configure test project build system.
> >     Call Stack (most recent call first):
> >       /usr/share/cmake/Modules/CheckCSourceCompiles.cmake:52
> (cmake_check_source_compiles)
> >       CMakeLists.txt:916 (CHECK_C_SOURCE_COMPILES)
> >
> > I checked the sources and there is no reference to WITH_GZFILEOP,
> > neither in the .spec file, thus it comes from some other project.
> >
> > Exactly the same test [1] passes fine in f39.
> >
> > Does this sound familiar to anyone? Maybe the library or what, which
> > exposes it, should be corrected?
> >
> >       Thanks and bye,
> >       Milan
> >
> > [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=111321151
> > [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=111321411
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> --
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to