On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 8:44 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:45:37AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > One additional point I forgot to address: the initial concern was that > > the KDE SIG would be implicitly responsible for maintaining these > > packages if they are included in the main repository. From a purely > > technical perspective, I think that we should state clearly that the > > KDE SIG would be required only to provide advance notice of major > > changes but would NOT be responsible for ensuring that these packages > > adapt to them. Of course, communicating that to users is harder (and > > they'll naturally report bugs to the wrong place in many cases), but I > > think the KDE SIG is completely permitted to refuse and retarget any > > issues that come up to the appropriate group. > > > > > > > My proposal for consideration is this: > > > "FESCo will allow these packages in the main Fedora repositories, > > > however they may not be included by default on any release-blocking > > > deliverable (ISO, image, etc.)" > > I think we should reword this proposal to address this point: > > "FESCo will allow these packages in the main Fedora repositories, > however they may not be included by default on any release-blocking > deliverable (ISO, image, etc.). The KDE SIG should provide a notice > before major changes, but is NOT responsible for ensuring that these > packages adapt."
I can absolutely support that. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
