On 27. 03. 24 16:03, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:46 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com
<mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 25. 03. 24 7:48, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> Also botan got orphaned despite the FTI going away
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259559
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259559>> [1] ;-(
> Could it be un-orphaned back?
> [1] Seems FTI failed to close the bug fixed on 2024-03-07
It was closed after it was fixed. The update was stuck at beta freeze and
nobody associated the FTI bugzilla with it.
No, it was reported <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259559#c5>
installable (comment 5) on 7th March by fti-bugs but was not closed as it
should have been then.
On Fedora 41 only.
Then it was orphaned <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259559#c6>
(comment 6) on 21st March.
Yes, because it was still NEW and not acted upon by the maintainer.
Then again reported <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259559#c7>
installable (comment 7) on 25th which actually closed the bug.
On Fedora 40.
Which is why I am asking if the orphaned can be reverted, please.
Yes, if the previous maintainer is still interested in maintaining it, they can
take the package back by clicking on the *Take* button.
It makes no sense to me to assign it back to them if they are not interested.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
