Dne 28. 03. 24 v 10:59 dop. Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
I also think the conversion should only be done if the full License string can
be converted. Partial conversion is confusing, and there is not much value,
since trivial conversion is, well, trivial, and whoever will eventually need to
take a look at the nontrivial parts can easily handle it then.
I'd add a "me too": I think if we have mixed spdx and callaways strings,
this will make later automatic processing even harder.
I that is possible, I think you should just do the full conversion for
those packages, even if that requires some manual introspection.
Ack. There is clear winner - not to mix the spdx and callaway.
I will do the change only for:
./bitstream-vera-fonts.spec:License: Bitstream Vera
./bpg-fonts.spec:License: Bitstream Vera
./bpg-fonts.spec:License: Bitstream Vera
./bpg-fonts.spec:License: Bitstream Vera
./bpg-fonts.spec:License: Bitstream Vera
./bpg-fonts.spec:License: Bitstream Vera
./bpg-fonts.spec:License: Bitstream Vera
./bpg-fonts.spec:License: Bitstream Vera
./bpg-fonts.spec:License: Bitstream Vera
./R-fontBitstreamVera.spec:License: Bitstream Vera
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
