I screwed up the isomd5sum checksums in the 1.2.4 release while trying
to fix support for small isos. I've reverted the change and 1.2.4-2 is
building for rawhide and Fedora 40. Thanks to Jonathan Billings for the
bug report (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277398).

The bad version made it into Fedora 40 and Rawhide.

With the bad version it will implant a checksum that is too short by 3
characters, but checking it will pass if you use 1.2.4-1 -- but not if
you use any of the previous versions. You can check for the bad checksum
by running checkisomd5sum --verbose and look for ';FR' at the end of the
reported checksum.

Spot checking the Fedora 40 netinst and workstation isos I don't see the
bad checksums so it looks like the build system was using a previous
version of implantisomd5 for the released isos.

Currently in rawhide the isos have the bad checksums, so the builders
will need to be updated to isomd5sum-1.2.4-2 to fix this.

Nobody except Jonathan noticed because normally the same version making
the checksum is used to check it. He was using mkksiso to make a custom
iso which resulted in the new iso failing the test at boot time due to
the iso having 1.2.3-23 on it and his host having 1.2.4-1 on it.

Hopefully this doesn't cause too many problems for people,

Brian

-- 
Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to