On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0600 Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net> wrote:
> Once upon a time, Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni...@redhat.com> said: > > Note that I am not saying things should go into buildroot as soon as > > they are built, but as soon as they are in updates-testing. There > > is a difference. There will still be reasons to use tags/overrides. > > That makes the push process much more fragile/difficult. If you use a > updates-testing build of package A, and package B (that depends on > package A) gets rebuilt, then you may have a package B that can't be > pushed to stable until package A gets pushed. What if there's a > security update on package B that needs to go to stable ASAP? Additionally, what if package A is built, after a few days serious problems are found in it and it's deleted until the maintainer can sort them out. What happens to packages B, C, D, and E that built against this version? They will have broken deps. I don't think this is worth even looking at until we have an AutoQA broken dep test live. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
