On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:13 AM Owen Taylor <otay...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi Neal - > > Daniel's original suggestion here (make pkg-config always look in /app too) > actually seems fine to me and simple, and I don't see any downsides. But > certainly flatpak-rpm-macros doesn't *just* modify RPM macros, it currently > also: > > - Changes the installation prefix for Python by dropping a distutils.cfg > - Adds a configuration file for Maven to change install and search paths > > So it's sort of a more general "flatpak-rpm-build" environment. If there was > a way to set PKG_CONFIG_PATH globally for the buildroot upon install of the > package, that could work too. (Or, yes, we could set FLATPAK_RPM_BUILD and > make pkg-config react to that). But how would you do that? mock --chroot > doesn't seem to pick things up from /etc/profile.d or /etc/environment. > > The only way I can think of doing it would be by configuring rpm.env.* for > the Flatpak build tags in Koji, and losing the property that you can "just" > drop flatpak-rpm-macros in to get the Flatpak RPM build environment. Do you > see any other way? >
Well, if you have a general package that's shipped in every buildroot for flatpak builds, you can ship your own wrapper, and I can make it check if RPM_BUILD_ROOT is defined *and* this file exists, it would redirect to that wrapper automatically. Or some variation of this. We used to do something similar for MinGW, I believe, so I think it'd work. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
