Do you see any problems if glibc starts using /usr/etc/services if
/etc/services does not exist?  Same for /usr/etc/protocols, /usr/etc/rpc
and so on.  It's already used on openSUSE, apparently.

And alternative proposal was to use /usr/share/services (which I really
dislike), or /usr/share/nss/services (to which I do not have any
objections).

Background:

  [PATCH] nss: look for databases in /usr/share/ if they don't exist in /etc/
  <https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/ZvZj2jkpJjhaP-Yc@gardel-login/>

  Tracking upstream projects that do not support hermetic-usr for configuration
  <https://github.com/uapi-group/specifications/issues/76>

Thanks,
Florian

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to