The alternative syntax that is backward compatible is using “-P 0" instead
of "0".
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024, 10:09 AM Susi Lehtola <jussileht...@fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> it appears rpm has now deprecated the old %patch syntax in rawhide, which
> means
> that any old-style expressions
>
> %patch0 -p1 -b .overflow
>
> must now be written as
>
> %patch 0 -p1 -b .overflow
>
> Unfortunately, all the epel branches, in turn, do not support the new
> %patch
> syntax. This means that one either
> - cannot use the same spec file to build in epel or
> - must introduce conditionals and duplicate code in the spec files
>
> %if 0%{?epel} < 10
> %patch0 -p1 -b .overflow
> %else
> %patch 0 -p1 -b .overflow
> %endif
>
> Is there any hope of fixing this issue, or altenatively, a known
> workaround that
> is compatible in both branches?
>
> Susi
> --
> Susi Lehtola
> Fedora Project Contributor
> jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
