On Thursday, October 31, 2024, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 10:15:03AM +0200, drago01 wrote: > > On Thursday, October 31, 2024, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:46:01PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > I know the idea of moving to -O3 has been briefly mentioned before in > > > > other contexts when we've discussed uplifting the flags, but it looks > > > > like Ubuntu is moving to -O3 for Ubuntu 25.04[1]. Is there a reason > > > > why we shouldn't consider doing the same for Fedora Linux 42? > > > > > > Yes, this is a very bad idea. > > > > > > -O3 significantly increases code size (and the speed up gains aren't > really > > > guaranteed), which is highly undesirable when the vast majority of > code in > > > the distro isn't performance critical, the I-cache footprint is then > more > > > important. > > > Isn't instruction cache footprint already part of "performance" i.e if > > performance is improved it shouldn't matter and vice versa, or what am I > > missing? > > That is not how compilers work, ... > That's not what I meant sorry. I mean we shouldn't worry about size or cache footprint, in the end what matters is performance. If we compile with -O3 and binaries are faster it doesn't matter if the code size is larger. Likewise if they are just bigger and perform worse or similar to -O2 it's pointless. Or iow cache footprint and binary size are just factors that determine performance, but not goals on their own.
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
