* Nikita Popov:
> In f42 the main llvm package switched to installing all files under a
> /usr/lib{64}/llvmN prefix and
> providing symlinks in the default prefix, to align the contents between the
> versioned and unversioned
> packages. What we were not aware of at the time is that rpm's support for
> symlinks is very bad.
>
> The latest issue we've run into is multilib installations. On f42, it's no
> longer possible to install
> llvm-devel.x86_64 and llvm-devel.i686 at the same time, because they have
> conflicts at paths like
> /usr/bin/opt. These conflicts previously existed as well, but while rpm will
> happily ignore multilib file
> conflicts (resolving in favor of x86_64), having a symlink conflict is a hard
> error. (The symlink will point
> to /usr/lib/llvmN/bin/opt on i686 and /usr/lib64/llvmN/bin/opt on x86_64.)
I think you should install executables into /usr/libexec/llvmN. These
paths will be identical across architectures. cthe symbolic link
targets will be the same, and the multilib conflicts should be gone.
Thanks,
Florian
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
