> But it's already done? It's right there. Well as my email mentions it is done for FHS 2.3 (and not even that really cause the version of the Standard is not mentioned anywhere). And what I am trying to ask about is either switching to a newer and more up to date Standard or having a concrete mention of the standard we are using at the moment and addressing the new things that have been changed lately (e.g.: the abovementioned `/usr/bin` `/usr/sbin` merge).
Pavol. On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 2:49 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6 2025 at 08:52:19 AM +02:00:00, Pavol Sloboda > <pslob...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Instead of adjusting to this text which is mostly of historical > > > interest, we should just use > > > > > > https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/latest/file-hierarchy.html > . > > > > I agree that we should use something that reflects the hierarchy we > > use nowadays the best with clearly set > > out exceptions to whatever rules we choose to get it just the way > > fedora is structured. This would be > > a big effort in the beginning but it would make the sustaining of the > > rules easier in the long run and it > > would also lead to a strict and defined ruleset which would remove > > the guesswork from maintaining this system. > > But it's already done? It's right there. > > >
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
