On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 05:41:10PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 3:49 AM Orion Poplawski <or...@nwra.com> wrote: > > > > On 8/10/25 16:43, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 12:45 AM Orion Poplawski <or...@nwra.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> My recollection is that having unmerged side tags around the release > > >> branch time can be an issue. Is my memory correct? > > > > > > Yes, this is a problem, since open side-tags could only get merged > > > into the new "branched" release, but not into rawhide - making it > > > impossible for the update to actually land where originally intended > > > (rawhide). > > > > I'm a little confused about this. Presumably updates filed now are > > intended to go into F43. Is there anything that would prevent such > > updates from landing in F43? > > Yes, updates filed now are intended to go into F43-is-rawhide, yes, > but not *only* into F43-is-branched.
Right, they would not be also first going to rawhide, but due to the git repo changes they would be in git for rawhide, just not built. kevin -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
