On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 1:53 PM Marcin Juszkiewicz <mjuszkiew...@redhat.com> wrote: > > As Fedora 43 gets into Beta I wanted to upgrade my system. > > Problem 3: package chromium-139.0.7258.138-1.fc43.aarch64 from fedora > requires libopenh264.so.8()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - installed package openh264-2.5.1-1.fc42.aarch64 conflicts with openh264 > provided by noopenh264-2.6.0-2.fc43.aarch64 from fedora > - installed package openh264-2.5.1-1.fc42.aarch64 obsoletes noopenh264 < > 1:0 provided by noopenh264-2.6.0-2.fc43.aarch64 from fedora > - problem with installed package > - installed package mozilla-openh264-2.5.1-1.fc42.aarch64 requires > libopenh264.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - installed package mozilla-openh264-2.5.1-1.fc42.aarch64 requires > openh264(aarch-64) = 2.5.1-1.fc42, but none of the providers can be installed > - chromium-140.0.7339.80-1.fc42.aarch64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package
Did you by chance have manual modifications to the cisco openh264 repo that hard-codes the version to "42"? Because it looks like you're pulling in the contents of the repo for F42 instead of for F43 (Fedora 43+ has openh264 2.6.0, not 2.5). Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
