On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 16:22:52 +0200 Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 3:19 PM Dan Horák <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > with the rebase of libatomic_ops to the latest upstream release 7.8.4 I > > went through the consumers of this library and reviewed the need for > > libatomic_ops there. Upstream discourages the use of libatomic_ops in > > new(er) projects, because better alternatives exist in form of C11 or C+ > > +14 standard atomics. > > > > With those PRs applied > > - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pulseaudio/pull-request/15 > > - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rakudo/pull-request/22 > > - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/moarvm/pull-request/21 > > libatomic_ops will become a leaf package and can be considered > > deprecated. There is no plan to retire it in the near future as it's > > still maintained upstream. > > See also the documentation here: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/#_prerequisites_for_deprecation > > So you can mark the package as "officially" deprecated if there are no > dependent packages left without paperwork. nice, thanks for the pointer Dan -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
