thanks. pls ignore the permission part --- it seems related to the fact that I did the work in a docker, something happened during the srpm creations.
Regards! Yonghang On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 9:26 AM Yonghang Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi team, > > Could you help advise what I need for this review? thanks. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392647 > > in review template, > > 1. For the license part, now all files in the prep'd directory have a > license. Or all files within the source tarball should have a license --- > means I will need preprocessing until upstream applies the same as well? > > 2. I have no idea about the warnings below. They have normal permissions > in source tarball. > > ``` > > seergdb.src: W: strange-permission add_copyrights_to_source_files.patch 666 > seergdb.src: W: strange-permission add_spdx_license_to_markdowns.patch 666 > seergdb.src: W: strange-permission seergdb-2.5.tar.gz 666 > seergdb.src: W: strange-permission seergdb.1 666 > seergdb.src: W: strange-permission seergdb.metainfo.xml 666 > seergdb.src: W: strange-permission seergdb.spec 666 > > ``` > > 3. Anything I can do from the maintainer's side? > > > Regards! > > > Yonghang > > > >
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
