On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 4:00 PM Maxwell G <maxw...@gtmx.me> wrote: > I also opened https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3476 about the SIG > membership issue.
Ah, now I understand. I believe the use case of non-packager members of pkgdb groups I outlined with db-sig is legitimate. So far I haven't found that the packager privileges would leak from pague UI through pkgdb groups to non-packager users. But should there be any leak, I agree that it has to be fixed. Michal -- Michal Schorm Software Engineer Databases Team Red Hat -- On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 4:00 PM Maxwell G <maxw...@gtmx.me> wrote: > > On 9/18/25 9:52 PM, Maxwell G wrote: > > It turns out there are several members of packaging SIGs (FAS groups > > that are synced to distgit) that are not members of the packager group > > [1]. Is there something to be done here? > > I also opened https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3476 about the SIG > membership issue. > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
