On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 12:00 PM Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 6:53 PM Richard Shaw <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I plan to update OpenImageIO in a side tag and rebuild all dependencies. > Interestingly abipkgdiff did not find any real changes: > > > > Comparing the ABI of binaries between > OpenImageIO-3.0.11.0-3.fc44.x86_64.rpm and > OpenImageIO-3.1.8.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm: > > Removed binaries: > > [D] /usr/lib64/libOpenImageIO.so.3.0.11, SONAME: libOpenImageIO.so.3.0 > > [D] /usr/lib64/libOpenImageIO_Util.so.3.0.11, SONAME: > libOpenImageIO_Util.so.3.0 > > Added binaries: > > [A] /usr/lib64/libOpenImageIO.so.3.1.8, SONAME: libOpenImageIO.so.3.1 > > [A] /usr/lib64/libOpenImageIO_Util.so.3.1.8, SONAME: > libOpenImageIO_Util.so.3.1 > > No ABI change between OpenImageIO-3.0.11.0-3.fc44.x86_64.rpm and > OpenImageIO-3.1.8.0-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm > > This only means "one library removed, one library added" since it > doesn't consider them to the the same library. > Did you also pass the "-devel" package that includes the unversioned > .so symlink in the abipkgdiff command? > I've never had to pass the -devel package before, I usually just pass the library package. I *DO* have to delete the debugsource and other (non-library) -debuginfo packages or it complains it can't handle that situation, 3 years after I started using the tool. I know it's no one's job necessarily but I find it interesting that no one with better programming ability has fixed that problem just out of pure annoyance :) Thanks, Richard
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
