On Mi, 17.12.25 09:54, Neal Gompa ([email protected]) wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 9:44 AM Simo Sorce <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2025-12-17 at 05:03 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > Sure, but we explicitly *do not want* to do that. So, keeping the DTBs > > > merged into vmlinux makes sense. > > > > Sorry but who is "we" ? > > > > Because I am pretty sure any security minded person really is for > > moving to use just vfat for boot and not deal with developing and > > maintaining out of tree filesystem drivers. > > Don't paint it with that broad of a brush. I'm certainly security > minded and *I* don't want that.
At this point, frankly, I hear more key people from all sides arguing *for* vfat than against. I mean, it does appear as if the only really loud voice in all this who defends booting from complex fs all the time is a certain Neal Gompa. > There are trade-offs with putting > stuff on vfat, particularly around file size, partition size, > compatibility issues with various EFI implementations, and so on. not sure where even to start. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
