On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 09:56:29PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Friday, 09 January 2026 at 18:45, Brian C. Lane wrote: > [...] > > Dominik's original reply didn't make it to me for some reason :/ > > It made it to the list: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/VROI3LDN5OTZRWVL2XQJFDGPSMHB2SV5/ >
Yeah, not sure what ate it. > > I feel pretty strongly that gnupg1 needs to be retired, not transferred. > > It isn't just a matter of maintaining it, it's because upstream isn't > > working on it despite it being called stable. It's dangerous to users to > > have it available in the distribution. > > Ok. I will drop the signature verfication in the tin package, then, > once gnupg1 is retired. Thanks! I've run fedpkg retire on it just now. Brian -- Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
