On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 09:44, Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 04:01:20PM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2026 at 20:53, sagitter--- via devel > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Some of my packages need Boost; so, please, let me know when you start > > > the rebuilds > > > > You can check the status of your packages in the test rebuild at: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ppalka/boost-1.90-2-all-arches/builds/ > > > > If the package isn't there, it doesn't depend on any boost shared > > libs, so we won't be rebuilding it. > > Hmm, your original mail was Jan 9th, and I fixed the linux-sgx package > compat with GCC 16 on Jan 7th. This copr is showing 8 attempts to rebuild > it using the outdated dist-git content that fails with GCC 16, and now the > merged side tag has created broken deps.
Those are two separate things. The test builds in copr were done using the mass-prebuild tool. I'm not sure exactly how that works, but if the builds were done using content from before your fixes on Jan 7th, then the test builds won't have built the fixed package. But that's nothing to do with the merged side tag, which did not use any of the content from the copr test builds. The copr test builds are still in copr and only in copr and not leaving copr. The fact that those used old package versions doesn't affect what's in rawhide, at all. > > Why weren't these builds done with latest rawhide ? The test builds were done with the latest rawhide *when the test builds started*. The side tag builds that have been merged back to rawhide were done with the latest rawhide too, but a much later rawhide than the test builds in copr, because the side tag builds were done much later. I think linux-sgx just needs to be rebuilt again with the new boost. That didn't happen in the side tag because linux-sgx FTBFS with the new boost: asio::io_service qgs_server.h:46:33: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘&’ token This is not a problem with GCC 16, so I doubt you already fixed it on Jan 7th. Boost.Asio has removed the deprecated io_service typedef, so code using that name should be changed to use io_context instead. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
