On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 05:37:27PM +0100, Adrian Reber via devel wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 01:07:07PM +0100, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 10:08:30AM +0100, Adrian Reber via devel wrote:
> > > I will update libcdio to 2.2.0 in rawhide which comes with a changed
> > > soname for libiso9660 (libiso9660.so.11 -> libiso9660.so.12).
> > >
> > > Currently following packages depend on libiso9660.so.11:
> > >
> > > cdw
> > > pycdio (retired)
> > > vcdimager
> > > xine-lib
> > >
> > > All dependencies rebuild without errors in COPR. I will do the rebuilds
> > > in a side tag next week.
> >
> > can you please provide a link to the COPR packages of libcdio? I am
> > interested in testing them.
>
> Let's try it once more. This time trying to update to 2.3.0:
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/adrian/libcdio220/builds/
>
> The copr is still called 220 but it contains 2.3.0. The 2.2.0 release
> had an unfixed CVE which waited to be fixed before doing the update.
>
> libcdio still has the same three dependencies in rawhide which need to
> be rebuilt which will happen next week in a side tag.
The update and rebuilds are done and the side tag has been merged.
Thanks to Adam and automatic testing I was reminded that pycdio still
needs to be updated. The pycdio package is indeed retired for over 6
years now, but python-pycdio is not. After also rebuilding python-pycdio
CI was much happier.
Adrian
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
